Artificial intelligence (AI) brings many benefits to many areas of life , from automating work in factories to supporting creative processes in marketing agencies. However, like any technology, it can also be used in an unethical way . In the world of competitions that we love so much, there have already been cases of fraud using A. Which have the public and presented organizers with completely new challenges. Let’s look at a few high-profile examples of such fraud and the ways in which AI has been for unfair competition.
1. Creative competitions – artificial intelligence as a creator
Current art competitions to writing. Graphic design, and music are particularly vulnerable to the unethical use of AI. It can easily be to generate high-quality content that is later presented as the participants’ own work. Although the use of AI tools is not always (many competition organizers do not address the issue in their rules at all), the lack of transparency and taking credit for the algorithm’s work has numerous discussions and ethical disputes.
5th Jiangsu Popular Science and Science Fiction Competition
In 2023, the second prize inthe 5th Jiangsu Popular Science and Science Fiction Competitionheld in China was won byShen Yang, a professor at the Beijing School of Journalism and Communication. The competition task was to write a science fiction novella.
Professor Yang took 3 hours to write his competition work entitled”The Land of Machine Memories”.Or to be more precise, he did not write it, but generated it using artificial intelligence tools. The AI also created a full outline of the novel, illustrations, and even a pseudonym under which the work was submitted to the competition. According to Chinese reports. The outline of over 40,000 characters wason 66 instructions that the AI received from the author. Only one of the jury members was informed by Professor Yang that the entry was entirely generated by artificial intelligence. The rest were unaware of this, in order to see how such a work would be judged by them.Xiao Xinghan, a science fiction writer and one of the judges who voted against Professor Yang’s novella, said that he recognized the text generated by the AI. Despite this fact, the other jury members rated the work high enough to takesecond place out of 200 entries.
Colorado State Fair Art Competition
One of the most high-profile cases of AI being used in art competitions was the victory in the prestigious Colorado State Fair competition in the Digital Arts category in 2022.Jason Allen, an artist from Colorado. Entered the competition with a painting entitled”Théâtre D’opéra Spatial. Created using the AI tool MidJourney. After the results were announced. Allen openly admitted that he used AI to generate the painting.
But the fact that the algorithm created the entire painting caused outrage among artists, other contestants, and art critics alike. The organizers of the competition admitted that although the winner did not break any of the rules, his win exposed the problem of the lack of clear rules regarding the use of AI in art. Allen’s victory has sparked many debates about the future of art, ethical standards, and creativity in the era of artificial intelligence. Interestingly, in 2024, Allen came to the conclusion that he was losing millions of dollars because people were copying his works made using artificial intelligence, and he is fighting in court to copyright his works.
Pokémon Trading Card Game Illustration Contest 2024
Every year, The Pokémon Company organizesa contest aimed at finding a new illustrator for the globally popular Pokémon TCG cards. In the first editions of the contest, only Japanese people could participate, but under the pressure of public argentina whatsapp number data 5 million opinion, for several years now, residents of other countries have also been able to participate. Unfortunately, this year’s of the contest a lot of controversy whenone of the participants, who made it into the final 300, quite clearly artificial intelligence to create his works.What’s more.
He the contest under several different identities. In this case, the scam was caught by the other contest participants and r an uproar. The organizers of The Pokémon Company that the problem did occur. Ultimately, the fraudster. And honest entries were in his place. Despite the fraudster being and excluded. It is disturbing that he to get this far with such an easy-to-detect scam. Fortunately, the competition community was very vigilant and partially relieved the organizers of their role as sheriff.
Sony World Photography Awards
In March 2023, the Sony World Photography Awardsannounced a black-and-white photograph of a young and older woman. PSEUDOMNESIA: The Electrician. The winner in the creative photography category. The verdict . Among creditors’ interests other things, that the photograph resembles the visual language of family portraits from the 1940s. Huthor of the photograph, Berlin-basedBoris Eldagsen. The award. It turned out that his competition entry was not a photograph at all, but an image using the DALL-E 2 image generator. In a statement on his website. Eldagsen that he had the AI-generated image on purpose to see if contemporary competitions were to catch dishonest entries. It turned out that they were not, and the case became so loud that it a lively discussion in the artistic world about the threats to contemporary art posed by the rapid development of technology.
DigiDirect’s Photo Contest
Another successful example of a provocation was a “photo” to DigiDirect’s annual photography contest held in Australia.An AI- image of a beach at sunset won the contest. Effectively fooling the judges intobelieving fax marketing that the entry was a real drone photo. The experiment was actually a publicity stunt for art and design company Absolutely. Hich s the photo under the pseudonym. After winning and collecting the $100 prize. Absolutely AI admitted to its ruse and returned the prize to the organizers.
2. Unfair use of AI in competitions in Poland
In Poland, artificial intelligence is also increasingly appearing in the context of creative competitions, such as art, photography. Graphic design, or literature competitions. Although there are still no widely cases of fraud involving its use. It is hard to imagine that our country would be completely free from such situations. Generative tools. Such as MidJourney or ChatGPT, are becoming increasingly perfect. While at the same time widely available and easy to use.
Competitions of this type are relatively often and are generally at promoting creativity. However, it is known that participants are increasingly. Using modern technologies that are supposed to perform the creative process in part or in whole for them. Concerns about the ethics of their use in competitions will therefore grow.
3. The effects of AI fraud
Artificial intelligence fraud poses completely new challenges for competition organizers. Not only do they undermine the principle of fair competition, but they also force the introduction of new formal regulations . In today’s world, templates of regulations from past promotional campaigns will no longer work. In the case of literary, photography or art competitions. Organizers are increasingly starting to use tools to detect content generated. By artificial intelligence to prevent unfair practices and restore the spirit of healthy competition.
On the other hand, there are also competitions for the best use of artificial intelligence and other modern technologies. In such cases, however, it is clear to everyone and the fight can take place on equal terms.